CVE-2020-28189
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-29189. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2020-29189. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-29189 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
Source: CVE-2020-28189
CVE-2020-27724
In BIG-IP APM versions 16.0.0-16.0.0.1, 15.1.0-15.1.0.4, 15.0.0-15.0.1.3, 14.1.0-14.1.3, 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2, on systems running more than one TMM instance, authenticated VPN users may consume excessive resources by sending specially-crafted malicious traffic over the tunnel.
Source: CVE-2020-27724
CVE-2020-28169
The td-agent-builder plugin before 2020-12-18 for Fluentd allows attackers to gain privileges because the bin directory is writable by a user account, but a file in bin is executed as NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM.
Source: CVE-2020-28169
CVE-2020-27725
In version 15.1.0-15.1.0.5, 14.1.0-14.1.3, 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2 of BIG-IP DNS, GTM, and Link Controller, zxfrd leaks memory when listing DNS zones. Zones can be listed via TMSH, iControl or SNMP; only users with access to those services can trigger this vulnerability.
Source: CVE-2020-27725
CVE-2020-27718
When a BIG-IP ASM or Advanced WAF system running version 16.0.0-16.0.0.1, 15.1.0-15.1.0.5, 14.1.0-14.1.3, 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, or 11.6.1-11.6.5.2 processes requests with JSON payload, an unusually large number of parameters can cause excessive CPU usage in the BIG-IP ASM bd process.
Source: CVE-2020-27718
CVE-2020-27721
In versions 16.0.0-16.0.0.1, 15.1.0-15.1.1, 14.1.0-14.1.3, 13.1.0-13.1.3.5, 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2, in a BIG-IP DNS / BIG-IP LTM GSLB deployment, under certain circumstances, the BIG-IP DNS system may stop using a BIG-IP LTM virtual server for DNS response.
Source: CVE-2020-27721
CVE-2020-35677
BigProf Online Invoicing System before 4.0 fails to adequately sanitize fields for HTML characters upon an administrator using admin/pageEditGroup.php to create a new group, resulting in Stored XSS. The caveat here is that an attacker would need administrative privileges in order to create the payload. One might think this completely mitigates the privilege-escalation impact as there is only one high-privileged role. However, it was discovered that the endpoint responsible for creating the group lacks CSRF protection.
Source: CVE-2020-35677
CVE-2020-35676
BigProf Online Invoicing System before 3.1 fails to correctly sanitize an XSS payload when a user registers using the self-registration functionality. As such, an attacker can input a crafted payload that will execute upon the application’s administrator browsing the registered users’ list. Once the arbitrary Javascript is executed in the context of the admin, this will cause the attacker to gain administrative privileges, effectively leading into an application takeover. This affects app/membership_signup.php and app/admin/pageViewMembers.php.
Source: CVE-2020-35676
CVE-2020-35669
An issue was discovered in the http package through 0.12.2 for Dart. If the attacker controls the HTTP method and the app is using Request directly, it’s possible to achieve CRLF injection in an HTTP request.
Source: CVE-2020-35669
CVE-2020-2503
If exploited, this stored cross-site scripting vulnerability could allow remote attackers to inject malicious code in File Station. QNAP has already fixed these issues in QES 2.1.1 Build 20201006 and later.
Source: CVE-2020-2503