CVE-2022-27813

CVE-2022-27813

Motorola MTM5000 series firmwares lack properly configured memory protection of pages shared between the OMAP-L138 ARM and DSP cores. The SoC provides two memory protection units, MPU1 and MPU2, to enforce the trust boundary between the two cores. Since both units are left unconfigured by the firmwares, an adversary with control over either core can trivially gain code execution on the other, by overwriting code located in shared RAM or DDR2 memory regions.

Source: CVE-2022-27813

CVE-2023-46227

CVE-2023-46227

Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache InLong.

This issue affects Apache InLong: from 1.4.0 through 1.8.0, the attacker can use t to bypass. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong’s 1.9.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it.

[1] https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/8814

Source: CVE-2023-46227

CVE-2022-24401

CVE-2022-24401

Adversary-induced keystream re-use on TETRA air-interface encrypted traffic using any TEA keystream generator. IV generation is based upon several TDMA frame counters, which are frequently broadcast by the infrastructure in an unauthenticated manner. An active adversary can manipulate the view of these counters in a mobile station, provoking keystream re-use. By sending crafted messages to the MS and analyzing MS responses, keystream for arbitrary frames can be recovered.

Source: CVE-2022-24401

CVE-2022-26941

CVE-2022-26941

A format string vulnerability exists in Motorola MTM5000 series firmware AT command handler for the AT+CTGL command. An attacker-controllable string is improperly handled, allowing for a write-anything-anywhere scenario. This can be leveraged to obtain arbitrary code execution inside the teds_app binary, which runs with root privileges.

Source: CVE-2022-26941

CVE-2022-26942

CVE-2022-26942

The Motorola MTM5000 series firmwares lack pointer validation on arguments passed to trusted execution environment (TEE) modules. Two modules are used, one responsible for KVL key management and the other for TETRA cryptographic functionality. In both modules, an adversary with non-secure supervisor level code execution can exploit the issue in order to gain secure supervisor code execution within the TEE. This constitutes a full break of the TEE module, exposing the device key as well as any TETRA cryptographic keys and the confidential TETRA cryptographic primitives.

Source: CVE-2022-26942